Showing 1 - 8 of 8
During contractual negotiations, parties often make reliance expenditures that would increase the surplus should a contract be made. This paper analyzes decisions to invest in precontractual reliance under alternative legal regimes. Investments in reliance will be socially suboptimal in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005832330
Negative-expected-value (NEV) suits are ones in which the expected litigation costs exceed the expected judgment. This article offers a new theory for the credibility and success of plaintiffs with NEV suits. The theory is based on recognizing that litigation costs are generally not incurred all...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005832370
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005832372
When plaintiffs cannot predict the outcome of litigation with certainty, neither the American rule (each litigant bears its own litigation expenses) nor the British rule (the losing litigant pays the attorneys' fees of the winning litigant) would induce optimal decisions to bring suit....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005832404
In some exceptional circumstances, a restitution rule entitles parties that unilaterally confer a benefit on another party to recover the estimated value of the benefit. Usually, however, the law applies a mutual consent rule under which providers of a benefit cannot obtain any recovery without...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009321302
Under an "offer-of-settlement" rule, a party to a lawsuit may make a special offer to settle with the other party, such that if the other party rejects this offer, then this offer becomes part of the record in the case and may affect the allocation of litigation costs. Specifically, if the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005601605
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005725448
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005725510