Showing 1 - 10 of 151
In credence goods markets, experts have better information about the appropriate quality of treatment than their customers. Experts may exploit their informational advantage by defrauding customers. Market institutions have been shown theoretically to be effective in mitigating fraudulent expert...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012220097
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011771599
In credence goods markets, experts have better information about the appropriate quality of treatment than their customers. As experts provide both diagnosis and treatment, this leaves scope for fraud. We experimentally investigate how intensity of price competition and the level of customer...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011793497
We experimentally investigate the role of second opinions in markets where experts like doctors both diagnose and provide the services. Experts may exploit their informational advantage over customers and overtreat by providing a more costly and expensive treatment than necessary. We show that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011793524
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011969531
In credence goods markets, experts have better information about the appropriate quality of treatment than their customers. As experts provide both diagnosis and treatment, this leaves scope for fraud. We experimentally investigate how intensity of price competition and the level of customer...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009754802
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010359334
In credence goods markets, experts have better information about the appropriate quality of treatment than their customers. Experts may exploit their informational advantage by defrauding customers. Market institutions have been shown theoretically to be effective in mitigating fraudulent expert...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012315945
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012299665
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011702749