Showing 1 - 10 of 112
Indirect inference testing can be carried out with a variety of auxiliary models. Asymptotically these different models make no difference. However, in small samples power can differ. We explore small sample power with three different auxiliary models: a VAR, average Impulse Response Functions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011471762
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011618365
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010440122
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010382034
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003407959
We use available methods for testing macro models to evaluate a model of China over the period from Deng Xiaoping's reforms up until the crisis period. Bayesian ranking methods are heavily influenced by controversial priors on the degree of price/wage rigidity. When the overall models are tested...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010358430
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the empirical performance of the standard New Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model in its usual form with full-information rational expectations and compare it with versions assuming inattentiveness- namely sticky information...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013177225
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011817216
Indirect inference testing can be carried out with a variety of auxiliary models. Asymptotically these different models make no difference. However, the small sample properties can differ. We explore small sample power and estimation bias both with different variable combinations and descriptive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011886113
Indirect Inference has been found to have much greater power than the Likelihood Ratio in small samples for testing DSGE models. We look at asymptotic and large sample properties of these tests to understand why this might be the case. We find that the power of the LR test is undermined when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011317842