A cure for discrimination? Affirmative action and the case of California Proposition 209

Proposition 209, enacted in California in 1996 and made effective the following year, ended state affirmative action programs not only in education, but also for public employment and government contracting. This paper uses CPS data and triple difference techniques to take advantage of the natural experiment presented by this change in state law to gauge the labor market impacts of ending affirmative action programs. Employment among women and minorities dropped sharply, a change that was nearly completely explained by a decline in participation rather than by increases in unemployment. This decline suggests that either affirmative action programs in California had been inefficient or that they failed to create lasting change in prejudicial attitudes.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2005
Authors:	Myers, Caitlin Knowles
Publisher:	Bonn : Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Subject:	economics of gender and minorities \| affirmative action \| Proposition 209 \| discrimination

Full text |

More access options

Check Google Scholar

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

More details

Series:	IZA Discussion Papers ; 1674
Type of publication:	Book / Working Paper
Type of publication (narrower categories):	Working Paper
Language:	English
Other identifiers:	501149112 [GVK] hdl:10419/33452 [Handle]
Classification:	J71 - Discrimination ; J78 - Public Policy
Source:	EconStor

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010267531