A procedure for evaluation and selection of computer-aided software engineering (CASE) tools for analysis and design.

Due to the relative youth of the computer-aided software engineering (CASE) market and the lack of standards, evaluation of CASE tools is a difficult problem. This problem is made more difficult by the fact that no single CASE tool is able to satisfy the needs of all potential users. In addition, an incorrect choice is expensive in terms of money and time invested. In this thesis, the literature is surveyed and synthesized to produce procedures and criteria to be used in the evaluation and selection of CASE tools intended for the analysis and design phases of the software development life cycle.