A PROTECTIONIST BIAS IN MAJORITARIAN POLITICS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
Do politics affect trade policy? Despite an extensive literature examining the relationship between trade policy and some political factors, relatively few studies have explored the role of a country's electoral system, arguably one of the most fundamental characteristics of a nation's political landscape. This paper examines the empirical relationship between tariffs and electoral systems across countries and over time. The broad theoretical framework is provided by Grossman and Helpman, which predicts a bias towards a non-zero average tariff, i.e. a "protectionist bias", in countries with majoritarian systems, since politicians in a majoritarian system aim to maximize the welfare of their home districts, as opposed to the welfare of the nation as a whole. I compare average tariffs of countries with majoritarian systems to those with proportional systems, using methods that address the omitted variables/sample selection problem inherent to this analysis. I find that countries with majoritarian systems do indeed appear to have higher average tariffs than do countries with proportional systems. This result holds after controlling for other country-specific characteristics, such as a country's legal origins, colonial history, and geographic location. Copyright 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
| Year of publication: |
2009
|
|---|---|
| Authors: | EVANS, CAROLYN L. |
| Published in: |
Economics and Politics. - Wiley Blackwell. - Vol. 21.2009, 2, p. 278-307
|
| Publisher: |
Wiley Blackwell |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
A protectionist bias in majoritarian politics : an empirical investigation
Evans, Carolyn L., (2009)
-
National border effects : location, not nationality, matters
Evans, Carolyn L., (2007)
-
Border effects and the availability of domestic products abroad
Evans, Carolyn L., (2006)
- More ...