An economical comparison of proposed X¯ chart with MEWMA chart

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to make economic comparison of the proposed X¯ chart with the economic and economic‐statistical design of a multivariate exponentially weighted moving average (MEWMA) control chart proposed by Linderman and Love, using Lorenzen‐Vance cost model. Design/methodology/approach – The economic design of proposed X¯ chart, using Lorenzen‐Vance cost model, is discussed in the paper. It is observed that sampling interval (h) and expected cost/hour (C) depend on various parameters of the chart, used in this model. When there is any change in any parameter of the chart, obviously both sampling interval and expected cost will be different. So it is suggested that one should use Lorenzen and Vance cost model (equation 1) to compute sampling interval and expected cost/hour for the proposed X¯ chart. Findings – The economic design of the proposed X¯ chart has been compared with the economic and economic‐statistical design of the multivariate exponentially weighted moving average (MEWMA) control chart proposed by Linderman and Love. It is found that the proposed X¯ chart performs better than MEWMA chart proposed by Linderman and Love for sample sizes of 7, 9 and 10 for first set of parameters. The proposed X¯ chart also shows lower expected cost/hour than the MEWMA chart for sample size of 2 and 3 and for shifts of 2 and 3 for the second set of parameters. Research limitations/implications – A lot of effort has been made to develop the proposed X¯ chart for monitoring the process mean. Although optimal sampling intervals are calculated only for two sets of parameters for shifts in the process average of 1, 2 and 3, it can be computed for any set of parameters using the Lorenzen‐Vance cost model. Originality/value – The research findings could be applied to various manufacturing and service industries, as it is more effective than the Shewhart and EWMA charts.