Choosing Constraints as a Third Solution to Agency
The standard solutions to agency, incentive contracting and monitoring, are degraded by the frequency and the duration of the decisions affected. Decisions of low frequency and long duration are not effectively controlled by either monitoring or incentive contracting. For decisions of low frequency and long duration, constraining the firm's choices significantly reduces agency. Applying the theory, guidelines for choosing constraints are suggested, and propositions advanced. As one application, the mission statement is considered as a vehicle for embedding constraints. The theory is also investigated by examining existing recommendations for both the content and process of mission statements. Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004.
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Michael, Steven C. ; Pearce, John A. |
Published in: |
Journal of Management Studies. - Wiley Blackwell, ISSN 0022-2380. - Vol. 41.2004, 7, p. 1171-1197
|
Publisher: |
Wiley Blackwell |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The need for innovation as a rationale for government involvement in entrepreneurship
Michael, Steven C., (2009)
-
Marketing strategies that make entrepreneurial firms recession-resistant
Pearce, John A., (1997)
-
Choosing Constraints as a Third Solution to Agency
Michael, Steven C., (2004)
- More ...