Better utilization of the airport system capacities can significantly decrease delays, aswell as number of cancelled flights. An efficient Air Traffic Control system equippedwith advanced technology installations in the terminal area can help reduce flight delaysand cancellations. The same technology could also help reduce accidents in the terminalarea, thereby increasing the safety of the system. Due to the expense of fielding advancedtechnology in the terminal area, it is important to conduct realistic cost-benefit analysis topredict the life-cycle cost of the system.A computer simulation and optimization model to estimate the costs and benefits of fielding advanced technologies at airport terminal areas is introduced in this paper. The model developed is called the Cost-Benefit Analysis Terminal Investment Model (COTIM). This model considers costs and benefits to both service providers (Federal Aviation Administration and airport authorities) and users (Airlines). The modelcombines a simulation-optimization based approach to predict benefits and costs accruedin one day or throughout the life-cycle of the facility.
We present an example to demonstrate the functionality of the model using ChicagoO'Hare International Airport (ORD) equipped with the Integrated Terminal Weather System (ITWS). The Integrated Terminal Weather System (ITWS) is a relatively new technology that forecasts convective weather movements thus allowing Air Traffic Control (ATC) personnel to re-direct flights inside the terminal area efficiently.
COTIM estimates flight delays and cancellations at an airport, when the airport is equipped with advanced technologies such as ITWS. The model performs cost-benefit analysis by comparing a baseline scenario without terminal area technologies against a scenario with technology. The difference between the two scenarios help decision makers justify whether technology investments are warranted of not.
