Cumulative prospect theory and gambling.
Whilst Cumulative Prospect theory (CPT) provides an explanation of gambling on longshots at actuarially unfair odds, it cannot explain why people might bet on more favoured outcomes. This paper shows that this is explicable if the degree of loss aversion experienced by the agent is reduced for smallstake gambles (as a proportion of wealth), and probability distortions are greater over losses than gains. If the utility or value function is assumed to be bounded, the degree of loss aversion assumed by Kahneman and Tversky leads to absurd predictions, reminiscent of those pointed out by Rabin (2000), of refusal to accept infinite gain bets at low probabilities. Boundedness of the value function in CPT implies that the indifference curve between expectedreturn and winprobability will typically exhibit both an asymptote (implying rejection of an infinite gain bet) and a minimum at low probabilities, as the shape of the value function dominates the probability weighting function. Also the high probability section of the indifference curve will exhibit a maximum. These implications are consistent with outcomes observed in gambling markets.
Year of publication: 
2005


Authors:  Cain, M ; Law, D ; Peel, D 
Publisher: 
The Department of Economics 
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person

Cumulative prospect theory and gambling
Cain, M, (2005)

Cumulative prospect theory and gambling
Peel, D, (2005)

Cumulative prospect theory and gambling
Cain, M, (2005)
 More ...