External Evaluation of the EU’s Sustainable Energy Cooperation (2011-2016) : Final Report ; Volume I – Main Report

The Evaluation Unit of the European Commission (EC’s) Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development (DG DEVCO) commissioned PEM to conduct an independent evaluation of the European Union’s cooperation with sustainable energy (2011-2016). The purpose of this Report is to present the answers to the evaluation questions (EQs) and also the evaluation’s conclusions and recommendations. As stated in the Terms of Reference (TOR)the generic purpose of the evaluation is: to provide an independent assessment of the past and current cooperation and to identify lessons learned and make recommendations to inform current and future strategy and delivery. The scope consists of the following dimensions: Geographic scope: European Development Fund (EDF), the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI), intraACP and PanAfrican for sub-Saharan Africa and Asia (with priority on sub-Saharan Africa); Temporal scope: 2011-2016

MoreLess

Alternative title:	Evaluation of the EU’s Sustainable Energy Cooperation (2011-2016) : Final Report ; Volume II – Annexes
Year of publication:	2018-06
Other Persons:	Buhl-Nielsen, Eric (contributor) ; Robert Oksen, Stephanie (contributor) ; Lorentzen, Jens (contributor)
Institutions:	PEM Consult ; Aide à la Décision Economique (contributor) ; Institut de Recherches d'Applications des Méthodes de Développement (contributor) ; Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit - EuropeAid (contributor)
Subject:	AKP-Länder \| African-Caribbean-Pacific countries \| Asien \| Asia \| Bewertung \| evaluation \| Energiepolitik \| energy policy \| Entwicklungshilfe \| development aid \| EU \| Kooperation \| cooperation \| Nachhaltigkeit \| sustainability \| Programmangebot \| program offer \| südliches Afrika \| Southern Africa \| 2011 - 2016

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
2.CONTEXT
2.1 EU AND GLOBAL CONTEXT
2.2 INVENTORY
3. OUTLINE METHODOLOGY
4. ANSWERS TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.1 EQ1 – STRATEGIC RELEVANCE
4.2 EQ2 - POLICY
4.3 EQ3 – TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
4.4 EQ4 - CONVENTIONAL GRANT FUNDING FOR PHYSICAL INVESTMENTS
4.5 EQ5 - INNOVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS<br<4.6 EQ6 - EFFICIENCY
4.7 EQ7 - COORDINATION, COMPLEMENTARITY AND ADDED VALUE
5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 OVERALL CONCLUSION
5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
ANNEX 1. CONTEXT
ANNEX 2. SUMMARY EVALUATION MATRIX
Vollume 2
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ANNEX 1 - TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2 – METHODOLOGY
ANNEX 3 – INVENTORY
ANNEX 4 – KEY PERSONS MET/CONSULTED
ANNEX 5 – ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANNEX 6 – JUDGEMENT CRITERIA AND INDICATOR ANALYSIS

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012056097