Historical perspective, current industry practices and the latest developments in public reporting of mineral assests and properties for the extractive industry in South Africa.
ABSTRACTSouth Africa had its first democratic elections in 1994. This give rise to a new dimension in social, economic,political and legal fraternities. As result, a number of new rules governing the extractive industry beingintroduced over the last ten years. The regulatory environment, which affects the public reporting of explorationinformation, mineral resources and mineral reserves, has undergone major changes. These include:-· The impact of the effects of globalization on the mining industry since many large and smalloperating mining companies have been listed in more than one country;· Increased regulations introduced by the local JSE as revised listing requirements forreporting and internal controls, not only over financial reporting, but also over the preparationof supplementary information, including mineral resources and mineral reserves statements;and· Development of new international definitions and standards for the estimation and reportingof exploration information, mineral resources and mineral reserves. This due to theinternational competition for mineral exploration and development projects by global miningcompanies, which have lead to proactive jurisdictions to establish regulatory regimes withcommon fabric..Mineral resource and mineral reserve classification methods, standards and reporting have undergone manychanges since the discovery and commercial exploration of minerals as early as the 18th century. To a certainextent, even today there is still ongoing debate regarding the classification systems, definitions and the publicreporting of these assets for internal and external use. Over the years, different interpretation, understandingand classification has led to confusion and misunderstanding which resulted in world class reporting scandalsincluding, but not limited to, Bre-X, Shell and Enron. These scandals have highlighted the necessity ofstandardising the definitions, classification and reporting of mineral assets. The regulators and investors in themineral industry have also been awakened and have become biggest stakeholders in the development andimplementation of these rules in the industry. The concept of “competent person” was introduced andaccountability of reporting was moved to the individuals and directors that report these results into the publicdomain.In this research report the mineral resource and mineral reserve definitions and their developments, historicaldevelopments in the minerals industry, current standards and their use in the public reporting of explorationresults and mineral assets in the South African context are considered and reviewed in some detail. Included inthis report were also areas of possible misconception in the interpretation of categorisation of mineral assets.A practical case study on the Harmony proposal of a hostile take over bid on Goldfields was studied.Information in the public domain on this potential transaction was reviewed during the study, facts were thenanalysed and formed the basis of an independent opinion. It was concluded that the reporting of mineral assetsheld by Harmony did not comply with the general reporting principles; hence the report was consideredmisleading, confusing and materially inconsistent. Hence, in the author’s opinion, Harmony’s offer to Goldfieldsshareholders was unfair and unreasonable. Given that Goldfields held quality assets compared to Harmony,they should have offered a greater premium for these assets.To be clear and unambiguous, technical and financial information should be published on a comparable basisby all companies operating in the same industry sector, making the same basic assumptions. Public disclosureof mineral resources and mineral reserves is a logical step towards full disclosure of material informationbecause:-1) mineral resources and mineral reserves are material to all investors;2) residency or nationality of an investor should not determine what information is disclosed by acompany (need for internationally recognised standards); and3) mineral resources and mineral reserves are required to be considered in impairment andpurchase price allocation in accordance with IFRS.Lastly stakeholders in the mining industry should be reminded that the codes and rules are written for guidanceof professionals in pursuit of their professional work and it was recommended that large mining firms shouldestablish a mineral resource committee at board level to help and advise the board of directors in decisionmaking.
| Year of publication: |
2008-03-04
|
|---|---|
| Authors: | Njowa, Godknows |
| Subject: | public reporting | mineral assests |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Emmert, Martin, (2017)
-
Herr, Annika, (2015)
-
Emmert, Martin, (2023)
- More ...