"Indirect Expropriation" and the "Right to Regulate" in International Investment Law
It is a well recognised rule in international law that the property of aliens cannot be taken, whether for public purposes or not, without adequate compensation. Two decades ago, the disputes before the courts and the discussions in academic literature focused mainly on the standard of compensation and measuring of expropriated value. The divergent views of the developed and developing countries raised issues regarding the formation and evolution of customary law. Today, the more positive attitude of countries around the world toward foreign investment and the proliferation of bilateral treaties and other investment agreements requiring prompt, adequate and effective compensation for expropriation of foreign investments have largely deprived that debate of practical significance for foreign investors. Disputes on direct expropriation – mainly related to nationalisation that marked the 70s and 80s -- have been replaced by disputes related to foreign investment regulation ...
|Year of publication:||
|Institutions:||Directorate for Financial, Fiscal and Enterprises Affairs, Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE) ; OECD|
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004962314
Saved in favorites