IPA II Monitoring, Reporting and Performance Framework : Final report

The assignment for IPA II Monitoring, Reporting and Performance Framework (MRPF) has lasted over roughly one year, from December 2014 to December 2015, and its three successive Specific Objectives or components have been the following: Specific Objective 1: Help design and streamline the monitoring and reporting system (hereafter MRPF) in the context of IPA II assistance by assessing the state of play and legal requirements and by providing recommendations in a view of improving the relevance, quality and consistency of the monitoring and reporting framework. Specific Objective 2: Assess the limits of the evaluability and the scope of the Mid-Term Review of the IPA and ENI (instruments) to be carried out in 2017, having regard to the regulatory requirements, the institutional setting of the new financial instrument(s) and the monitoring of the degree of realisation of activities and results by that time and the monitoring and reporting system put in place. Specific Objective 3: Provide recommendations on how to ensure sufficient visibility of the IPA II performance, including ways to enhance transparency and improve compliance with the International Aid Transparency Standards, as well as ways to strengthen the relevance, quality and impact of the related information and communication activities

MoreLess

Alternative title:	IAP II – Suivi, Rapports and Cadre de Performance (SRCP) : Résumé excutif final
Year of publication:	2016-01-25
Other Persons:	Crnjanski, Dragan (contributor) ; Pantelias, Sarantis (contributor) ; Jahic, Edin (contributor)
Institutions:	B & S Europe ; Proman ; Europäische Kommission / Directorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations (contributor)
Subject:	Albanien \| Albania \| Bewertung \| evaluation \| Bosnien-Herzegowina \| Bosnia and Herzegovina \| Entwicklungshilfe \| development aid \| EU \| EU-Beitritt \| joining of the European Union \| Kosovo \| Mazedonien \| Macedonia \| Montenegro \| Programmplanung \| program planning \| Serbien \| Serbia \| Überwachung \| monitoring

Check Google Scholar |

More access options

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

Acronyms and Abbreviations
Executive Summary
INTRODUCTION
1. MONITORING, REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (MRPF)
1.1 Key Findings1.2 Assessment
1.3 Recommendations
1.3.1 General Recommendations
1.3.2 Specific recommendations on the MRPF architecture in each one of the IPA II beneficiaries
1.3.3 Multi-beneficiary Dimension of IPA II MRPF and Potential Role of ReSPA
2. EVALUABILITY OF IPA II MTR 2017
2.1 Key Findings & Conclusions
2.1.1 General Outline
2.1.2 How the specific requirements of the Regulations should be approached?
2.1.3 How the evaluation criteria should be approached/ used?
2.1.4 Are the indicators included in the Regulations, Programme Statement (PS) and Indicative (country & multi-country) Strategy Papers aligned and thus appropriate and sufficient for the implementation of the MTR 2017?
2.1.5 Which are the sources of information to be used for the MTR 2017 and how the required info/data should be collected and processed? Are intermediate evaluations (thematic, other) needed to be implemented, in order to contribute to specific subjects where direct info/data do not exist?
2.1.6 Which are the critical parameters for the data collection in view of the available time and the limited progress in the implementation of the IPA II actions?
2.1.7 How the required public consultation (general -for the wider public and specific -for the IPA II stakeholders) should be organized & implemented?
2.2 Assessment of the Evaluability of the MTR 2017
2.3 Recommendations
3. VISIBILITY OF IPA II PERFORMANCE
Introduction
3.1 Key Findings and Conclusions
3.1.1 Visibility
3.1.2 Transparency
3.2 Assessment
3.3 Recommendations
3.3.1 Communication Strategy of DG NEAR
3.3.2 Recommendations
4. PROPOSAL FOR IMMEDIATE FOLLOW-UP ACTION
ANNEXES
Annex 1 – Comprehensive Fieldwork Findings in IPA Beneficiaries
A 1.1 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Albania
A 1.2 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Bosnia & Herzegovina

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011799479