• GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
  • PREFACE
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  • VEDANTYSIS APIBENDRINIMAS
  • MAIN REPORT
  • 1. INTRODUCTION
  • 1.1. Objectives
  • 1.2. Background and Context
  • 1.3. Evaluation Questions
  • 1.4. Limitations Affecting the Evaluation
  • 2. PERFORMANCE OF PHARE ASSISTANCE
  • 2.1 Good Overall Performance
  • 2.2 Phare support has been highly relevant but there were weaknesses in addressing strategic issues
  • 2.3 Despite implementation delays, planned results were largely achieved
  • 2.4 Substantial results delivered
  • 2.5 Strong immediate and intermediate impact in institution building projects
  • 2.6 Phare focused on meeting the acquis, rather than securing sustainable reforms
  • 3. THEMATIC/ CROSSCUTTING FINDINGS
  • 3.1 Phare speeded up the acquis-driven reform process
  • 3.2 Progress in administrative and judicial capacity at sectoral level
  • 3.3 Limited ESC contribution to preparation for Structural Funds
  • 4. CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED
  • 4.1 Conclusions
  • 4.2 Recommendations and lessons learned
  • ANNEXES
  • Annex 1. Terms of Reference
  • Annex 2. Phare National and CBC Programme Data for Lithuania 1999-2001
  • Annex 3. Evaluation Planning Summary Sheet
  • Annex 4. Evaluation Indicators
  • Annex 5. Sample projects – Financial data and Results
  • Annex 6. List of Documents
  • Annex 7. List of Interviews
  • Annex 8. Written Response