Preparatory study for an impact assessment on a new legislative instrument replacing the Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA on illicit drug trafficking : Final Report ; March 2013
| Year of publication: |
2013-03-01
|
|---|---|
| Institutions: | ECORYS-NEI, Rotterdam ; ECLAN / European Criminal Law Academic Network ; Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz (contributor) |
| Publisher: |
Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen |
| Subject: | Drogenkriminalität | drug-related crime | Drogenpolitik | drug policy | EU | Rechtsanwendung | legal usage | Rechtsprechung | jurisdiction |
- 1.0 Introduction
- 1.1 Structure of the report
- 2.0 Context for the study
- 2.1 Competency of the EU
- 2.2 EU anti-drugs policy
- 2.3 United Nations Conventions
- 2.4 Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA and its rationale
- 3.0 Problem definition
- 3.1 The problem of major Illicit drug trafficking
- 3.2 Main drivers of the problems
- 3.3 Who is affected by the problems and how?
- 3.4 How would the problem evolve in the baseline scenario
- 3.5 Right to act and subsidiarity
- 4.0 Rationale, Objectives and Intervention Logic for a New EU Legislative Instrument
- 4.1 Rationale
- 4.2 Objectives and intervention logic
- 5.0 Policy options
- 5.1 Discarded options
- 5.2 Legal basis and decision-making procedure
- 5.3 Consistency of the options with EU policies and fundamental rights
- 5.4 Assessment criteria
- 5.5 Cluster A – scope for action
- 5.6 Cluster B – definition of offences
- 5.7 Cluster C – level of sanctions (Imprisonment)
- 5.8 Cluster D – financial penalties
- 5.9 Financial penalties for legal persons
- 5.10 Cluster E – aggravating and mitigating circumstances
- 5.11 Cluster F – jurisdiction
- 5.12 Territorial jurisdiction
- 5.13 Cluster G – judicial and law enforcement co-operation
- 5.14 Cluster H – Data and statistics
- 6.0 Comparison of the options and identification of the preferredoption
- 6.1 Comparison of impacts of the policy options
- 6.2 Scope for action
- 6.3 Definition of offences
- 6.4 Level of sanctions
- 6.5 Financial penalties
- 6.6 Aggravating and mitigating circumstances
- 6.7 Jurisdiction
- 6.8 Judicial and law enforcement cooperation
- 6.9 Data and statistics
- 6.10 Outline of the preferred policy option
- 7.0 Monitoring and evaluation
- Annex One: List of interviewees
- Annex Two: Research Materials
- Annex Three: Summary Tables
- Annex Four: Detailed Cost Analysis
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010527996