Rules of Proof, Courts, and Incentives

We analyze the design of legal principles and procedures for court decision-making in civil litigation. The objective is the provision of appropriate incentives for potential tort-feasors to exert care, when evidence about care is imperfect and may bedistorted by the parties. Efficiency is shown to be consistent with courts adjudicating on the basis of the preponderance of evidence standard of proof together with common law exclusionary rules. Inefficient equilibria may nevertheless also arise under these rules. Directing courts as to the assignment of the burden of proof is then useful as a coordination device. Alternatively, burden of proof guidelines are unnecessary if courts are allowed a more active or inquisitorial role, by contrast with that of passive adjudicator.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2006-10-01
Authors:	Demougin, Dominique ; Fluet, Claude
Subject:	Beweislast \| burden of proof \| Bürgerlicher Rechtsstreit \| civil litigation \| Gerichtentscheidung

Full text |

More access options

Check Google Scholar

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

1. Introduction
2. The Model
3. Optimal Liability Assignment
4. Burden of Proof
5. Court Decision-Making
6. Related literature and conclusions

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005858072