- GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
- PREFACE
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- MAIN REPORT
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 1.1 Objectives of the Evaluation
- 1.2 Background and Context
- 1.3 Evaluation Questions
- 2. PERFORMANCE OF PHARE ASSISTANCE
- 2.1 The statistics MBPs were relevant and well-designed
- 2.2 Some serious delays but generally efficiently managed
- 2.3 Good statistical support to key EU macro-economic policies
- 2.4 Wider objectives largely achieved with high standards of statistical reporting
- 2.5 Sustainability remains a problem
- 3. THEMATIC/ CROSS-CUTTING FINDINGS
- 3.1 Performance of NSOs significantly improved
- 3.2 The administrative capacity of NSOs has been strengthened by Phare
- 3.3 The MBP approach was effective and essential
- 4. CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED
- 4.1 Conclusions
- 4.2 Recommendations
- 4.3 Lessons Learned
- ANNEXES
- Annex 1. Terms of Reference
- Annex 2. Evaluation Questions, Criteria and Indicators
- Annex 3. Background to the Statistics MBPs
- Annex 4. Statistical Series and EU Policies
- Annex 5. Pilot Projects in 2002 and 2003 Statistics MBPs
- Annex 6. Timelines of main activities and contractors
- Annex 7. Table of the contractors per project
- Annex 8. Interim Evaluation Report with details of action taken by Eurostat
- Annex 9. List of interviews
- Annex 10. List of documents referred to during the Evaluation
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10012036378