• GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
  • PREFACE
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  • MAIN REPORT
  • 1. INTRODUCTION
  • 1.1 Objectives of the Evaluation
  • 1.2 Background and Context
  • 1.3 Evaluation Questions
  • 2. PERFORMANCE OF PHARE ASSISTANCE
  • 2.1 The statistics MBPs were relevant and well-designed
  • 2.2 Some serious delays but generally efficiently managed
  • 2.3 Good statistical support to key EU macro-economic policies
  • 2.4 Wider objectives largely achieved with high standards of statistical reporting
  • 2.5 Sustainability remains a problem
  • 3. THEMATIC/ CROSS-CUTTING FINDINGS
  • 3.1 Performance of NSOs significantly improved
  • 3.2 The administrative capacity of NSOs has been strengthened by Phare
  • 3.3 The MBP approach was effective and essential
  • 4. CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED
  • 4.1 Conclusions
  • 4.2 Recommendations
  • 4.3 Lessons Learned
  • ANNEXES
  • Annex 1. Terms of Reference
  • Annex 2. Evaluation Questions, Criteria and Indicators
  • Annex 3. Background to the Statistics MBPs
  • Annex 4. Statistical Series and EU Policies
  • Annex 5. Pilot Projects in 2002 and 2003 Statistics MBPs
  • Annex 6. Timelines of main activities and contractors
  • Annex 7. Table of the contractors per project
  • Annex 8. Interim Evaluation Report with details of action taken by Eurostat
  • Annex 9. List of interviews
  • Annex 10. List of documents referred to during the Evaluation
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10012036378