- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- INTRODUCTION
- PART I
- COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL REPORTS
- (A) GENERAL STRUCTURE OF NATIONAL JURISDICTIONAL RULES FOR CROSSBORDERDISPUTES
- (B) BILATERAL AND MULTILATERAL CONVENTIONS
- (C) APPLICABLE NATIONAL RULES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 4 OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION
- (D) NATIONAL JURISDICTION & ENFORCEMENT OF NON-EU JUDGMENTS
- (E) DECLINING JURISDICTION
- (F) THE ADEQUATE PROTECTION (OR LACK THEREOF) OF EU NATIONALS AND/OR DOMICILIARIES THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF NATIONAL JURISDICTIONAL RULES
- (G) RESIDUAL JURISDICTION UNDER THE NEW BRUSSELS II REGULATION
- PART II
- RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED FURTHER
- HARMONISATION OF JURISDICTION
- (A) THE INITIAL OBJECTIVE OF REGULATING JURISDICTION IN “COMMUNITYDISPUTES”
- (B) THE MAIN OPTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED HARMONIZATION
- (C) PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPPRESSION OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN EU AND NON-EU DEFENDANTS
- (D) FURTHER HARMONIZATION OF JURISDICTION UNDER BRUSSELS II
- CONCLUSIONS
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010527847