The value of preserving the four large predators in Sweden: Regional differences considered

This paper contributes with an applied policy analysis of the predator preservation <p> policy in Sweden. We estimate the social benefits from preserving the four large <p> predators in Sweden by applying a contingent valuation approach. The vehicle we use <p> to fulfil our objectives is data from a survey that were mailed out in the spring of 2004. <p> We find that the Swedish population is divided in half concerning their support for the <p> predator policy package and that the overall mean WTP for preserving the four large <p> predators in Sweden is approximately SEK 290. We also find that the WTP differ <p> substantially between different regions in Sweden. Respondents in Stockholm have the <p> highest WTP whereas the lowest WTP is found for respondents living in Wolfterritories. <p> Finally we find that our measure of the social value is sensitive with respect <p> to response-uncertainty. When the respondents are allowed to be uncertain about their <p> valuation they state a higher value. The main conclusion is that the social-value of <p> preserving the four large predators in Sweden may be negative since the stated benefits <p> seem to be rather small.