Thematic Interim Evaluation of the European Union Pre-Accession Assistance : Review of Twinning in Croatia

The purpose of this thematic interim evaluation is to review the current Phare pre-accession twinning assistance dedicated to Croatia and to make recommendations for improvements of the current Phare twinning programmes, as well as provide an input to the debate on future programming and implementation arrangements for twinning under the new Instrument for Pre-Accession in the Croatian context. This thematic interim evaluation report has been prepared by the MWH Consortium1 during the period from August 2008 to October 2008 and reflects the situation at 31 October 2008, the cut-off date for the report. The evaluation is based on an analysis of programme documents, including previous ex post and interim evaluations, and on interviews with beneficiaries and stakeholders. It examines the performance of the twinning instrument in addressing the objectives stated in the formal programming documents and provides a general assessment of twinning in Croatia. It draws conclusions and puts forward recommendations for future increased twinning performance.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2008-12-17
Institutions:	MWH Consortium ; Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung (contributor)
Subject:	Bewertung \| evaluation \| Entwicklungshilfe \| development aid \| EU \| EU-Beitritt \| joining of the European Union \| Kroatien \| Croatia \| Partnerschaft \| partnership \| Strukturförderung \| promotion of economic structure \| Wirtschaftsentwicklung \| economic development (on national level)

Check Google Scholar |

More access options

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

PREFACE
GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MAINREPORT
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
1.2 Objectives of the Thematic Evaluation
1.3 Methodology
2 EVALUATION FINDINGS
2.1 Twinning meets Croatian needs but key institutions and procedures are weak
2.2 Twinning support generally achieved its intended results
2.3 Sustainability depends on ownership at the decision-making level
3 LESSONS LEARNED
4 CONCLUSIONS
5 RECOMMENDATIONS
ANNEXES
Annex 1. Terms of reference
Annex 2. Scope of the Evaluation – Programme Details
Annex 3. List of Interviews
Annex 4. List of Documents Referred to in the Evaluation

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476787