This paper introduces a framework for selecting policies that maximize expected welfare under estimation uncertainty. The proposed method explicitly balances the size of the estimated welfare against the uncertainty inherent in its estimation, ensuring that chosen policies meet a reporting...

This paper introduces a framework for selecting policies that maximize expected welfare under estimation uncertainty. The proposed method explicitly balances the size of the estimated welfare against the uncertainty inherent in its estimation, ensuring that chosen policies meet a reporting...

Bayesian decisions are observationally identical to decisions with judgment. Decisions with judgment test whether a judgmental decision is optimal and, in case of rejection, move to the closest boundary of the confidence interval, for a given confidence level. The resulting decisions condition...

Bayesian decisions are observationally identical to decisions with judgment. Decisions with judgment test whether a judgmental decision is optimal and, in case of rejection, move to the closest boundary of the confidence interval, for a given confidence level. The resulting decisions condition...

It has often been noted that the "null-hypothesis-significance-testing" (NHST) framework is an inconsistent hybrid of Neyman-Pearson's "hypothesis testing" and Fisher's "significance testing" that almost inevitably causes misinterpretations. To facilitate a realistic assessment of the potential...

A decision maker tests whether the gradient of the loss function evaluated at a judgmental decision is zero. If the test does not reject, the action is the judgmental decision. If the test rejects, the action sets the gradient equal to the boundary of the rejection region. This statistical...