Showing 1 - 10 of 98
In the recent past, considerable effort in health economics has been made on applying stated preference methods such as contingent valuation and choice experiments. Despite this increased use, there is still considerable scepticism concerning the value of these approaches. The application of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009459486
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012535259
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012189182
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012082417
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005516281
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005516500
Discrete choice experiments have the advantage that they can study preferences in health care where revealed preference data is not readily available. However, as a substitute for actual observed market led data, the experimental set-up for hypothetical situations must mimic the circumstances...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005440611
Individuals' rationality has been a key issue long debated in Economics. While normative theories establish the way 'rational' consumers should behave, many empirical studies have documented numerous systematic violations of normative principles. This has led some to question the validity of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005442643
Lancsar and Savage argue that current methods of deriving welfare estimates, using discrete choice experiments, are inconsistent with random utility and welfare theory. In this paper I show that this not the case. The general formula proposed by Small and Rosen for estimating welfare, which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005442719
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005383255