Showing 1 - 10 of 120
In the mean–variance framework, insurance demand goes down when the expected size of insurable losses decreases or insurance premia increase if the elasticity of risk aversion with respect to expected wealth exceeds -1. In terms of the expected-utility approach, this condition is equivalent to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011118177
In a mean variance framework, we analyse risk taking in the presence of a (possibly) dependent background risk, exemplified in a linear portfolio selection problem. We first characterise the comparative statics of changes in the distribution and dependence structure of the background risk. For...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010875260
An agent with two-parameter, mean-variance preferences is called variance vulnerable if an increase in the variance of an exogenous, independent background risk induces the agent to choose a lower level of risky activities. Variance vulnerability resembles the notion of risk vulnerability in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005057800
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005622591
This note provides an alternative proof for the equivalence of decreasing absolute prudence (DAP) in the expected utility framework and in a two-parametric approach where utility is a function of the mean and the standard deviation. In addition, we elucidate that the equivalence of DAP and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005753470
We call an agent skewness affine if and only if his marginal willingness to accept a risk increases when the distribution of the risk becomes more skewed to the right. Skewness affinity is shown to be equivalent to the marginal rate of substitution between mean and variance of wealth being...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008869050
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008776421
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010200415
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011615444
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014331782