Showing 1 - 10 of 286
This paper develops a structural equilibrium model with intertemporal macroeconomic risk, incorporating the fact that firms are heterogeneous in their asset composition. Compared to firms that are mainly composed of invested assets, firms with growth options have higher costs of debt because...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003979512
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009719728
This paper develops a structural equilibrium model with intertemporal macroeconomic risk, in-corporating the fact that ¯rms are heterogeneous in their asset composition. Compared to ¯rmswhich are mainly composed of invested assets, ¯rms with growth options have larger costs ofdebt because...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009249006
This paper develops a model to investigate the impact of renegotiable debt on firms. The novel feature is that firms can renegotiate debt both in distress and outside distress, which allows us to rationalize empirical timing patterns of debt renegotiations. We show that this feature is crucial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012899143
This paper develops a model with the novel feature that firms can renegotiate debt both in and outside distress. We show that this feature is crucial for debt renegotiation models to explain corporate policies and debt prices. Specifically, the model reflects empirical credit spread patterns,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011345070
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014318128
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012281725
We investigate the compensation of counterparty exposure in the prices of structured products. Our analysis reveals that product issuers do not compensate retail investors for counterparty exposure before the Lehman default. Post-Lehman, retail prices no longer neglect this risk. We also measure...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010410201
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011964585
In the first three decades of CRSP data, value stocks have higher betas than growth stocks.Later on, the ranking is reversed and the gap in beta widens. What makes growth strategiesnowadays bear more market risk than value strategies? What are the causes of the reversalin the ranking of betas?...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005868660