Showing 1 - 10 of 81
We allow departures from IIA in Arrow’s framework. Our measure of the extent of a departure is the amount of information needed to socially order a pair of alternatives. We also propose a measure of the scope of an individual’s power. The scope of at least one individual’s power increases...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010846006
There exist social choice rules for which every manipulation benefits everyone. This paper constructs a large variety of rules with this property and provides two characterizations of such rules. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010949840
We identify the maximal number of people who are harmed when a social choice rule is manipulated. If there are n individuals, then for any <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$$k$$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> greater than 0 and less than n, there is a neutral rule for which the maximal number is <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$$k$$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and there is an anonymous rule for which the maximum...</equationsource></inlineequation></equationsource></inlineequation>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010993545
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005061261
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005752998
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005147257
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008775589
We investigate the implications of relaxing Arrow's independence of irrelevant alternatives axiom while retaining transitivity and the Pareto condition. Even a small relaxation opens a floodgate of possibilities for nondictatorial and efficient social choice.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369487
Assuming an odd number of voters, E. S. Maskin recently provided a characterization of majority rule based on full transitivity. This paper characterizes majority rule with a set of axioms that includes two of Maskin's, dispenses with another, and contains weak versions of his other two axioms....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005370724
A feasible alternative x is a strong Condorcet winner if for every other feasible alternative y there is some majority coalition that prefers x to y. Let <InlineEquation ID="Equ1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX"><![CDATA[${\cal L}_{C}$]]></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (resp., <InlineEquation ID="Equ2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX"><![CDATA[$\wp_{C})$]]></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> denote the set of all profiles of linear (resp., merely asymmetric) individual preference relations for which a strong Condorcet...</equationsource></inlineequation></equationsource></inlineequation>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005371154