Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Most research linking compensation to strategy relies on agency theory economics and focuses on executive pay. We instead focus on the strategic compensation of non-executive employees, arguing that while agency theory provides a useful framework for analyzing compensation, it fails to consider...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014043466
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008771317
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011459393
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009616353
This paper investigates the pricing distortions that arise from the use of a common non-linear incentive scheme at a leading enterprise software vendor. The empirical results demonstrate that salespeople are adept at gaming the timing of deal closure to take advantage of the vendor's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009712387
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009563504
We investigate how the convexity of a firm’s incentives interacts with worker overconfidence to affect sorting decisions and performance. We demonstrate experimentally that overconfident employees are more likely to sort into a non-linear incentive scheme over a linear one, even though this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014045541
This paper argues that conflicting incentives among managers may impede potential knowledge sharing benefits from vertical integration. I study knowledge-based agency costs from vertical integration in car leasing, where manufacturer-owned captive lessors compete with independent lessors. Both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013133795
Behavioral economists have proposed that incentive contracts result in higher productivity when bonuses are “loss framed”—prepaid then clawed back if targets are unmet. We test this claim in a large-scale field experiment. Holding financial incentives fixed, we randomized the pre- or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013324669
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011752291