Showing 1 - 10 of 12
This paper proposes a novel standardized test for abnormal returns in long-horizon event studies that takes into account cross-sectional correlation, autocorrelation, and hetersoskedasticity of stock returns. Extensive simulation analyses demonstrate improved size and power of testing relative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012974179
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011487238
Because stock prices are not normally distributed, the power of nonparametric rank tests dominate parametric tests in event study analyses of abnormal returns on a single day. However, problems arise in the application of nonparametric tests to multiple day analyses of cumulative abnormal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010572334
This paper investigates the robustness of existing long-run event study methodologies using the Asia-Pacific security market data. In doing so, the study employs the buy-and-hold abnormal return approach and the calendar time portfolio method to measure the return anomalies. Since each of these...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013020840
Because of non-normality of stock returns nonparametric rank tests are gaining incremental popularity over parametric tests in financial economics event studies. In rank tests financial assets' multiple day cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) are replaced by cumulated ranks. This paper proposes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013238247
Because of non-normality of stock returns nonparametric rank tests are gaining incremental popularity over parametric tests in event studies. In rank tests multiple day cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) are replaced by cumulated ranks. We propose modifications to the existing approach that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013049281
This study applies a rolling estimation window approach to adjust for time-varying risk parameters in asset pricing models to compute long-run abnormal returns after major corporate events. Abnormal returns are defined as realized returns minus predicted returns on each day in a five-year,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012843482
This article re-examines the issue of cross-sectional correlation. Kolari and Pynnonen (2010) find that, in the case of event-date clustering with the same event window for all firms, relatively low cross-sectional correlation among abnormal returns can seriously bias standard tests to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012852434
This article examines the issue of cross-sectional correlation in event studies. When there is event-date clustering, we find that even relatively low cross-correlation among abnormal returns is serious in terms of over-rejecting the null hypothesis of zero average abnormal returns.We propose a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013114804
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011782610