Similar Search Results

Tearing the veil of privacy law : an experiment on chilling effects and the right to be forgotten

Hermstrüwer, Yoan; Dickert, Stephan - 2013

consent constitute a price that people are willing to accept for increased compliance with social norms. Providing people with …, nudging people towards potential publicity does not increase the value they place on privacy. We also test how the default …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009781369

I lie? We lie! Why? : experimental evidence on a dishonesty shift in groups

Kocher, Martin; Schudy, Simeon; Spantig, Lisa - 2016

Unethical behavior such as dishonesty, cheating and corruption occurs frequently in organizations or groups. Recent experimental evidence suggests that there is a stronger inclination to behave immorally in groups than individually. We ask if this is the case, and if so, why. Using a...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011509008

I lie? We lie! Why? : experimental evidence on an dishonesty shift

Kocher, Martin; Schudy, Simeon; Spantig, Lisa - 2016

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011509462

Identifying social norms using coordination games : spectators vs. stakeholders

Erkut, Hande; Nosenzo, Daniele; Sefton, Martin - 2014

We investigate social norms for dictator game giving using a recently proposed norm-elicitation procedure (Krupka and … Weber, 2013). We elicit norms separately from dictator, recipient, and disinterested third party respondents and find that … elicited norms are stable and insensitive to the role of the respondent. The results support the use of this procedure as a …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010436501

The role of interpersonal uncertainty in prosocial behavior

Chakraborty, Anujit; Henkel, Luca - 2024

In prosocial decisions, decision-makers are inherently uncertain about how their decisions impact others' utility - we call this interpersonal uncertainty. We show that people's response to interpersonal uncertainty shapes well-known patterns of prosocial behavior. First, using standard social...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014578386

The role of interpersonal uncertainty in prosocial behavior

Chakraborty, Anujit; Henkel, Luca - 2024

In prosocial decisions, decision-makers are inherently uncertain about how their decisions impact others’ utility – we call this interpersonal uncertainty. We show that people’s response to interpersonal uncertainty shapes well-known patterns of prosocial behavior. First, using standard...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014576953

Responding to (un)reasonable requests

Pelligra, Vittorio; Reggiani, Tommaso; Zizzo, Daniel John - 2016

We consider the notions of static and dynamic reasonableness of requests in a trust game experiment. We vary systematically the experimental norm of what is expected from trustees to return to trustors, both in terms of level of each request and in terms of sequence of the requests. Static...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011531913

On the persistence of strategic sophistication

Geōrganas, Sōtērēs; Healy, Paul J.; Weber, Roberto A. - 2014

We examine whether the "Level-k" model of strategic behavior generates reliable cross-game predictions within an individual. We find no correlation in subjects' estimated levels of reasoning across two families of games. Furthermore, estimating a higher level for Ann than Bob in one family of...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010249635

Guilt-averse or reciprocal? : looking at behavioural motivations in the trust game

Engler, Yola; Kerschbamer, Rudolf; Page, Lionel - 2016

For the trust game, recent models of belief-dependent motivations make opposite predictions regarding the correlation between back-transfers and second- order beliefs of the trustor: While reciprocity models predict a negative correlation, guilt-aversion models predict a positive one. This paper...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011480420

Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered

Luhan, Wolfgang J.; Kocher, Martin; Sutter, Matthias - 2006 - This version: 8 August 2006

While most papers_new on team decision-making find teams to behave more selfish, less trusting and less altruistic than individuals, Cason and Mui (1997) report that teams are more altruistic than individuals in a dictator game. Using a within-subjects design we re-examine group polarization by...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011349704