Showing 1 - 10 of 51
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001609312
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001726508
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008653189
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002976911
This paper shows that because growth models in the tradition of Solow's and Romer's are framed in terms of production functions, they are equally subject to a criticism developed by, among others, Phelps Brown (1957), Simon (1979a), and Samuelson (1979). These authors argued that production...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012835343
This paper shows that because growth models in the tradition of Solow's and Romer's are framed in terms of production functions, they are equally subject to a criticism developed by, among others, Phelps Brown (1957), Simon (1979a), and Samuelson (1979). These authors argued that production...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012118296
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012261108
This paper offers a retrospective view of the key pillar of Solow's neoclassical growth model, namely the aggregate production function. We review how this tool came to life and how it has survived until today, despite three criticisms that undermined its raison d'être. They are the Cambridge...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014500314
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015050968
This paper provides evidence of a problem with the influential testing and assessment of Solow's (1956) growth model proposed by Mankiw et al.'s (1992). It is shown that when the assumption of a common rate of technical progress is relaxed in the neoclassical model, the goodness of fit of Mankiw...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014063715