Showing 1 - 10 of 16
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003992783
This paper studies the asymptotic validity of the Anderson-Rubin (AR) test and the J test of overidentifying restrictions in linear models with many instruments. When the number of instruments increases at the same rate as the sample size, we establish that the conventional AR and J tests are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005171026
This paper studies the asymptotic validity of the Anderson-Rubin (AR) test and the J test of overidentifying restrictions in linear models with many instruments. When the number of instruments increases at the same rate as the sample size, we establish that the conventional AR and J tests are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013157075
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009310705
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003796112
This paper studies robustness of bootstrap inference methods for instrumental variable (IV)regression models. We consider test statistics for parameter hypotheses based on the IV estimatorand generalized method of trimmed moments (GMTM) estimator introduced by Cížek (2008, 2009),and compare...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010734584
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014430070
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015154525
This paper studies robustness of bootstrap inference methods for instrumental variable regression models. In particular, we compare the uniform weight and implied probability bootstrap approximations for parameter hypothesis test statistics by applying the breakdown point theory, which focuses...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013126073
This paper studies robustness of bootstrap inference methods for instrumental variable regression models. In particular, we compare the uniform weight and implied probability bootstrap approximations for parameter hypothesis test statistics by applying the breakdown point theory, which focuses...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009008183