Showing 1 - 10 of 109
This paper proposes a dichotomous choice model that is based on a transformed beta (or "z") distribution. This model, called betit, nests both logit and probit and allows for various skewed and peaked disturbance densities. Because the shape of this density affects the estimated relation between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001605236
This paper proposes a dichotomous choice model that is based on a transformed beta (or "z") distribution. This model, called betit, nests both logit and probit and allows for various skewed and peaked disturbance densities. Because the shape of this density affects the estimated relation between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011339695
This study involved conducting a survival analysis by fitting a Cox proportional hazards model to Korea Labor Panel data to analyze the impact of parental job loss on children's delayed admission to colleges and universities in South Korea, using 376 subjects whose parental education levels were...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013493177
In their IZA Discussion Paper 10247, Johansson and Lee claim that the main result (Proposition 3) in Abbring and Van den Berg (2003b) does not hold. We show that their claim is incorrect. At a certain point within their line of reasoning, they make a rather basic error while transforming one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011543629
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011924705
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011884671
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011625503
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011380103
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012050898
This paper shows that popular linear fixed-effects panel-data estimators (first-differences, within-transformation) are biased and inconsistent when applied in a discrete-time hazard setting, that is, one with the outcome variable being a binary dummy indicating an absorbing state, even if the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012120020