Showing 1 - 10 of 19
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001661315
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001661316
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001668902
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002150195
In this paper we analyze a legislative bargaining game in which parties privately informed about their preferences bargain over an ideological and a distributive decision. Communication takes place before a proposal is offered and majority rule voting determines the outcome. When the private...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008665138
We study a model of sequential bargaining in which, in each period before an agreement is reached, the proposer's identity (and whether there is a proposer) are randomly determined; the proposer suggests a division of a pie of size one; each other agent either approves or rejects the proposal; and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008652131
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003951579
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009157192
In this paper we analyze a legislative bargaining game in which parties privately informed about their preferences bargain over an ideological and a distributive decision. Communication takes place before a proposal is offered and majority rule voting determines the outcome. When the private...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008669935
Prior research on "strategic voting" has reached the conclusion that unanimity rule is uniquely bad: it results in destruction of information, and hence makes voters worse off. We show that this conclusion depends critically on the assumption that the issue being voted on is exogenous, i.e.,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003787573