Showing 1 - 9 of 9
In their merger control, EU and the US have considered symmetric size distribution (cost structure) of firms to be a factor potentially leading to collusion. We show that forbidding mergers leading to symmetric market structures can induce mergers leading to asymmetric market structures with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005645413
Many convicted cartels have a leader which is substantially larger than its rivals. In a setting where firms face indivisible costs of collusion, we show that: (i) firms may have an incentive to merge so as to create asymmetric market structures since this enables the merged firm to cover the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005792412
In their merger control, EU and the US have considered symmetric size distribution (cost structure) of firms to be a factor potentially leading to collusion. We show that forbidding mergers leading to symmetric market structures can induce mergers leading to asymmetric market structures with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005069733
In their merger control, EU and the US have considered symmetric size distribution (cost structure) of firms to be a factor potentially leading to collusion. We show that forbidding mergers leading to symmetric market structures can induce mergers leading to asymmetric market structures with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005115559
In their merger control, EU and the US have considered symmetric size distribution (cost structure) of firms to be a factor potentially leading to collusion. We show that forbidding mergers leading to symmetric market structures can induce mergers leading to asymmetric market structures with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010320098
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009722949
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010022505
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010578941
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003543984