Showing 1 - 10 of 27
To the best of our knowledge, most of the few methodological studies which analyze the impact of faked interviews on survey results are based on ?artificial fakes? generated by project students in a ?laboratory environment?. In contrast, panel data provide a unique opportunity to identify data...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261661
Statistische Daten sind im allgemeinen - gemessen an idealtypischen Erhebungsbedingungen - nicht fehlerfrei, insbesondere können sie durch die Art, wie sie erhoben werden, beeinflusst werden ("Erhebungsartefakte"). Interviewereffekte spielen in diesem Zusammenhang in der Literatur eine...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011432499
To the best of our knowledge, most of the few methodological studies which analyze the impact of faked interviews on survey results are based on "artificial fakes" generated by project students in a "laboratory environment". In contrast, panel data provide a unique opportunity to identify data...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011439529
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001555605
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001882689
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002629591
This paper presents two new tools for the identification of faking interviewers in surveys. One method is based on Benford's Law, and the other exploits the empirical observation that fakers most often produce answers with less variability than could be expected from the whole survey. We focus...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002243139
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001876960
This study examines the phenomenon of nonresponse in the first wave of a refresher sample (subsample H) of the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). Our first step is to link additional (commercial) microgeographic data on the immediate neighborhoods of the households visited by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008824846
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001463963