Showing 1 - 10 of 17
A common perception about the neoclassical growth model is that an economy devoid of capital cannot evolve to strictly positive levels of output if capital is essential. We challenge this view by positing a broad class of production functions, encompassing the neoclassical production function,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003301114
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013424379
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003002261
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014382464
This paper introduces tasks into the neoclassical production sector. Competitive firms choose the profit-maximizing amounts of factor-specific tasks that determine their factor demands and output supplies. We show that the effect of factor-augmenting technical change on relative and absolute...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012229238
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012098827
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012419396
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010483753
The Inada (1963) conditions constitute a defining property of the neoclassical production function with capital and labor as arguments. Are these conditions justifiable on economic grounds? Yes, they are: we show that a production function with positive, yet diminishing marginal products and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010465163
The determinants of the direction of technical change and the implications for economic growth are studied in the one-sector neoclassical growth model of Ramsey (1928), Cass (1965), and Koopmans (1965) extended to allow for endogenous capital- and labor-augmenting technical change. For this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010490615