Showing 1 - 10 of 99,624
, Australian HILDA) we investigate a) the selectivity of item non-response (INR) and b) the impact of imputation as a prominent … average in SOEP and HILDA, while this relationship is negative using BHPS data. However, once applying the very same … imputation procedure used for HILDA and SOEP, namely the "row-and-columnimputation" approach suggested by Little & Su (1989 …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011630557
, Australian HILDA) we investigate a) the selectivity of item non-response (INR) and b) the impact of imputation as a prominent … average in SOEP and HILDA, while this relationship is negative using BHPS data. However, once applying the very same … imputation procedure used for HILDA and SOEP, namely the "row-and-column-imputation" approach suggested by Little & Su (1989 …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005822762
, Australian HILDA) we investigate a) the selectivity of item non-response (INR) and b) the impact of imputation as a prominent … average in SOEP and HILDA, while this relationship is negative using BHPS data. However, once applying the very same … imputation procedure used for HILDA and SOEP, namely the “row-and-columnimputation” approach suggested by Little & Su (1989 …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005018729
, Australian HILDA) we investigate a) the selectivity of item non-response (INR) and b) the impact of imputation as a prominent … average in SOEP and HILDA, while this relationship is negative using BHPS data. However, once applying the very same … imputation procedure used for HILDA and SOEP, namely the “row-and-columnimputation” approach suggested by Little & Su (1989 …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011600695
, Australian HILDA) we investigate a) the selectivity of item non-response (INR) and b) the impact of imputation as a prominent … average in SOEP and HILDA, while this relationship is negative using BHPS data. However, once applying the very same … imputation procedure used for HILDA and SOEP, namely the row-and-column-imputation approach suggested by Little & Su (1989), also …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010324248
, Australian HILDA) we investigate a) the selectivity of item non-response (INR) and b) the impact of imputation as a prominent …Using data on annual individual labor income from three representative panel datasets (German SOEP, British BHPS … harmonization of (income) data production as well as of imputation strategies across surveys. All three panels make use of …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010324270
, Australian HILDA) we investigate a) the selectivity of item non-response (INR) and b) the impact of imputation as a prominent … average in SOEP and HILDA, while this relationship is negative using BHPS data. However, once applying the very same … imputation procedure used for HILDA and SOEP, namely the "row-and-column-imputation" approach suggested by Little & Su (1989 …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013316815
) Longitudinal imputation of the missing income components. The aim of this paper is to show how the choice of technique affects …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008824841
, Australian HILDA) we investigate a) the selectivity of itemnon-response (INR) and b) the impact of imputation as a prominent post …Using data on annual individual labor income from three representative panel datasets(German SOEP, British BHPS …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005861862
) Longitudinal imputation of the missing income components. The aim of this paper is to show how the choice of technique affects …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011600932