Showing 1 - 10 of 796
eliminate the possibility to make a normative argument supporting a multidimensional notion of utility. -- utility ; pleasures …The concept of "utility" is often used in ambiguous ways in economics, from having substantive psychological … can we compare different pleasures? This paper assesses the evidence from psychology and neurosciences on how to best …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003905687
-dimensional decision outcomes, economic theory assumes a uni-dimensional utility measure. This paper reviews evidence from behavioral and … makers' difficulties can be explained once the motivational aspects of utility ("wanting") are disentangled from the … experiential ones ("liking") and the features of the different psychological processes involved are recognized. -- utility …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009409675
decision outcomes, economic theory assumes a unidimensional utility measure. This paper reviews evidence from behavioral and … makers’ difficulties can be explained once the motivational aspects of utility (“wanting”) are disentangled from the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011051322
Neuroeconomics stays in the center of the ongoing naturalistic turn in economics. It portrays the individual as a complex system of decision making mechanisms and modules. This results into a conceptual tension with the standard economic notion of the unity of the actor that is a systemic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003785973
I argue that it is microeconomics that needs foundations, not macroeconomics. Preferences need to be built on biology, and, in particular, on neuroscience. In contrast, macroeconomics could benefit from rationalizations of aggregate economic phenomena by non-equilibrium statistical physics. --...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003843048
Contrary to claims by Gul and Pesendorfer (2008), I show that standard economics makes use of non-choice evidence in a meaningful way. This is because standard economics solely grounded in the theory of choice is "incomplete". That is, it has content that can not be revealed with any general...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003894920
Combining different new approaches to human behavior in neuroeconomics, the cognitive sciences and institutional economics, this paper sketches the fundamentals of a naturalistic theory of economic order. In this endeavour, the argument follows the track laid down by Hayek's comprehensive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009382379
This paper presents an overview of recent research in neuroeconomics, in the light of the question how these relate to institutional economics. I present a critique of Glimcher's recent internalist standard model of neuroeconomics and put forward the claim that only an externalist approach can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009315573
In recent sociological studies of markets, especially financial markets, researchers have argued that economics is performative (MacKenzie, Callon et al.). By this they refer to the observation that theories such as the Black-Scholes formula do not simply describe reality, but contributed to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003874929
This paper reviews the debate in economics over neuroeconomics' contribution to economics. It distinguishes majority and minority views, argues that this debate has been framed by mainstream economics' conception of itself as an isolated science, and argues that this framing has put off the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012993779