Search Results - subject_exact:"Peer review"

Narrow search

The 30th annual meeting of the German finance association in Aachen

Breuer, Wolfgang; Knetsch, Andreas - 2026

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015618452

AI and publication commons

Atasu, Atalay - 2026

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015666485

Can AI Solve the Peer Review Crisis? A Large-Scale Experiment on LLM's Performance and Biases in Evaluating Economics Papers

Pataranutaporn, Pat; Powdthavee, Nattavudh; Maes, Pattie - 2025

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015338903

Can AI solve the peer review crisis? : a large-scale experiment on LLM's performance and biases in evaluating economics papers

Pataranutaporn, Pat; Powdthavee, Nattavudh; Maes, Pattie - 2025

We investigate whether artificial intelligence can address the peer review crisis in economics by analyzing 27,090 evaluations of 9,030 unique submissions using a large language model (LLM). The experiment systematically varies author characteristics (e.g., affiliation, reputation, gender) and...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015196646

Are lessons being learnt from the replication crisis or will the revolution devour its children? : Open Q science from the editor's perspective

Hüttel, Silke; Hess, Sebastian - 2025

The scientific production system is crucial in how global challenges are addressed. However, scholars have recently begun to voice concerns about structural inefficiencies within the system, as highlighted, for example, by the replication crisis, the p-value debate and various forms of...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015610257

Nurturing ideas, cultivating reviewers : the C.E.D.A.R. tree of generative peer review

Cristofaro, Matteo; Duplat, Valérie - 2025

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015652390

Peer Review der amtlichen Statistik 2021 bis 2023 – Ablauf und Bewertung des im Dezember 2021 erfolgten Peer Reviews beim Statistischen Bundesamt

Decker, Jörg; Jacob, Simon; Vermeer, Andréa - 2022

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10013408692

Peer Review der amtlichen Statistik 2021 bis 2023 : Ablauf und Bewertung des im Dezember 2021 erfolgten Peer Reviews beim Statistischen Bundesamt

Decker, Jörg; Jacob, Simon; Vermeer, Andréa - 2022

Das Statistische Bundesamt hat 2021 zum dritten Mal am in regelmäßigen Abständen vom Statistischen Amt der Europäischen Union durchgeführten Peer Review teilgenommen. Dieses wichtige Verfahren der Qualitätssicherung und Harmonisierung der Prozesse der amtlichen Statistik im Europäischen...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10013401779

Peer Review in der Berufsbildungsforschung: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage

Rödel, Bodo - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014637017

Show one more version 1

Peer Review in der Berufsbildungsforschung : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage

Rödel, Bodo - 2024

Book / Working Paper

A streamlined survey instrument to moderate university students' grades for group projects

Dix, Stephen - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015340933

Show one more version 1

A streamlined survey instrument to moderate university students' grades for group projects

Dix, Stephen - 2024

Article

Publishing in premier journals with high impact factor and Q1 journals : Dos and Don'ts

Paul, Justin - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014531751

Le "Desk Rejection" : pourquoi cela se produit et comment l'éviter?

Derrouiche, Ridha; Fernandes, Valérie - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015050455

Revise and resubmit? : Peer reviewing business historical research

Lubinski, Christina; Decker, Stephanie; MacKenzie, Niall G. - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014580190

Peer-to-peer, or peer pressure?

Popp, Andrew - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014580237

Revise and resubmit? : or conditional accept?

Iszatt-White, Marian - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014580263

Make peer review great (again?)

Sørensen, Anders Ravn - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014580271

Is peer review ripe for a revise and resubmit? : academics might be less the party answering that question

Lindebaum, Dirk - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014580277

Students' experiences of peer learning in an accounting research module : discussion forums, peer review and group work

Steenkamp, Gretha; Brink, Sophia Magaretha - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015665710

Der Peer Review 2021 bis 2023 im Europäischen Statistischen System: Qualitätssicherung zwischen Selbstverpflichtung und (gegenseitiger) Kontrolle

Herzner, Mirko - 2021

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10012656329

Der Peer Review 2021 bis 2023 im europäischen statististischen System : Qualitätssicherung zwischen Selbstverpflichtung und (gegenseitiger) Kontrolle

Herzner, Mirko - 2021

In den Jahren 2021 bis 2023 findet zum dritten Mal ein sogenannter Peer Review im Europäischen Statistischen System (ESS) statt. In diesem Verfahren wird die Umsetzung des Verhaltenskodex für europäische Statistiken in den nationalen statistischen Ämtern überprüft. Der Beitrag erläutert...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10012653665

Geopolitics in the evaluation of international scientific collaboration

Furnas, Alexander; Jia, Ruixue; Roberts, Margaret E.; … - 2026

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015620954

Field Experiments in the Science of Science : Lessons from Peer Review and the Evaluation of New Knowledge

Boudreau, Kevin - 2026

Scientific evaluation and peer review govern the allocation of resources and certification of knowledge in science, yet have been subjected to limited causal investigation. This chapter synthesizes randomized experiments embedded in live peer-evaluation systems at journals, conferences, and...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015611116

Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes: People's Republic of China 2020 (Second Round) : Peer Review Report on the Exchange of Information on Request

2020

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10012452119

Show one more version 1

Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes: People's Republic of China 2020 (second round) : peer review report on the exchange of information on request

2020

Book / Working Paper

Gender and the time cost of peer review

Alexander, Diane; Gorelkina, Olga; Hengel, Erin; Tol, … - 2023

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014469429

Gender and the time cost of peer review

Alexander, Diane; Gorelkina, Olga; Hengel, Erin; Tol, … - 2023

In this paper, we investigate one factor that can directly contribute to-as well as indirectly shed light on the other causes of-the gender gap in academic publishing: length of peer review. Using detailed administrative data from an economics field journal, we find that, conditional on...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014317310

Peer review : problematic or promising?

Kelly, Diana - 2023

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014308791

Unpacking p-hacking and publication bias

Brodeur, Abel; Carrell, Scott; Figlio, David N.; … - 2023

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014483466

Show 4 more versions 4

Unpacking p-hacking and publication bias

Brodeur, Abel; Carrell, Scott; Figlio, David N.; … - 2023

Book / Working Paper

Unpacking p-hacking and publication bias

Brodeur, Abel; Carrell, Scott; Figlio, David N.; … - 2023

Book / Working Paper

Unpacking P-Hacking and Publication Bias

Brodeur, Abel; Carrell, Scott E.; Figlio, David N.; … - 2023

Book / Working Paper

Unpacking P-Hacking and Publication Bias

Brodeur, Abel; Carrell, Scott; Figlio, David N.; … - 2023

Book / Working Paper

The ideal review process is a three-way street

Ellinger, Andrea D.; Jonsson, Patrik; Chapman, Karen J.; … - 2023

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014292219

Reviewing excellence

Boer, Harry; Di Vincenzo, Fausto; Björk, Jennie; … - 2023

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014266445

Economics peer-review: problems, recent developments, and reform proposals

Siemroth, Christoph - 2023 - This version: April 24, 2023

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014283866

Manuscripts don't burn

Bikler, Šimšōn; Nitzan, Jonathan - 2023

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015175345

Understanding and developing contributions to marketing theory

Wilson, Matthew; Paschen, Jeannette; Robson, Karen; … - 2025

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015546830

Institutional ties and publications in top accounting journals

Whited, Robert L. - 2025

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015547596

Does Peer Review Penalize Scientific Risk Taking? Evidence from NIH Grant Renewals

Azoulay, Pierre; Greenblatt, Wesley H. - 2025

Scientific projects that carry a high degree of risk may be more likely to lead to breakthroughs yet also face challenges in winning the support necessary to be carried out. We analyze the determinants of renewal for more than 100,000 R01 grants from the National Institutes of Health between...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015326488

Designing scientific grants

Carnehl, Christoph; Ottaviani, Marco; Preusser, Justus - 2025

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015329664

Implementing the "Belt and Road" initiative in Central Asia in a pandemic : a regional risk assessment

Maigeldinov, Kazbek; Nechayeva, Yelena; Kozhirova, Svetlana - 2025

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015639465

Submit-to-accept times in accounting : determinants and comparisons to other business disciplines

Hurley, Patrick J.; Gal-Or, Ronen; Knechel, W. Robert; … - 2025

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015641324

Publishing quantitative research : exploring the peer-review process and manuscript acceptance rates

Reio, Thomas G. <Jr.> - 2025

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015543291

Tactical refereeing and signaling by publishing

Popov, Sergey V. - 2022

A peer review is used ubiquitously in hiring, promotional, and evaluation decisions, within academia and beyond. It is usually conducted to allocate limited resources, such as the budget of a funder or the pages of a journal. With limited capacity, a peer review may lead to negatively biased...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014433315

Show one more version 1

Tactical refereeing and signaling by publishing

Popov, Sergey V. - 2022

Book / Working Paper

Critiquing scientific writing for knowledge development in South African public administration scholarship : selected reviews in South African articles and books

Sebola, Mokoko Piet - 2022

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10013503779

Nobel and novice: author prominence affects peer review

Huber, Jürgen; Inoua, Sabiou; Kerschbamer, Rudolf; … - 2022

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10013365362

Innovating peer review, reconfiguring scholarly communication: an analytical overview of ongoing peer review innovation activities

Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang; Pinfield, Stephen; Waltman, Ludo; … - 2022

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014854871

Funding risky research

Franzoni, Chiara; Stephan, Paula E.; Veugelers, Reinhilde - 2022

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015049950

Blockchain solutions for scientific paper peer review: a systematic mapping of the literature

Farias Fávaro, Allan; Marcelino, Roderval; Cechinel, … - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015342694

Conservatism and representativeness heuristic in peer reviews : evidence from the finance literature 1946-2020

Chung, Kee H.; Lee, Choonsik - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10015065729

How to pay for scientific research

Checchi, Daniele; De Fraja, Gianni; Marchiori, Carmen; … - 2024

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014534098

Uncertainty and Individual Discretion in Allocating Research Funds

Goldstein, Anna P.; Kearney, Michael - 2024

There is a long-standing tradition in public research funding agencies of distributing funds via peer review, which aggregates evaluations of proposed research ideas from a group of external experts. Despite complaints that this process is biased against novel ideas, there is poor understanding...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014468233

What Is the Benefit from Publishing a Working Paper in a Journal in Terms of Citations? Evidence from Economics

Wohlrabe, Klaus; Bürgi, Constantin - 2021

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10012581988

Do working papers increase journal citations? : evidence from the top 5 journals in economics

Wohlrabe, Klaus; Bürgi, Constantin - 2021

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10012626617

Show one more version 1

Do working papers increase journal citations? : evidence from the top 5 journals in economics

Wohlrabe, Klaus; Bürgi, Constantin - 2020

Book / Working Paper

What is the benefit from publishing a working paper in a journal in terms of citations? : evidence from economics

Wohlrabe, Klaus; Bürgi, Constantin - 2021

Many papers in economics that are published in peer reviewed journals are initially released in widely circulated working paper series. This raises the question about the benefit of publishing in a peer-reviewed journal in terms of citations. Specifically, we address the question: To what extent...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de, ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10012485322