Slippage Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program: Reply
Given that the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) costs taxpayers $2 billion per year and remains the largest conservation program in U.S. history, Roberts and Bucholtz are to be commended for revisiting the slippage issue. However, their central point that regional variation in CRP acreage is endogenous is inconsistent with CRP implementation rules and data. Thus, it is not surprising that the null hypothesis of exogeneity cannot be rejected by statistical tests. Copyright 2005 American Agricultural Economics Association.
Year of publication: |
2005
|
---|---|
Authors: | Wu, JunJie |
Published in: |
American Journal of Agricultural Economics. - American Agricultural Economics Association. - Vol. 87.2005, 1, p. 251-254
|
Publisher: |
American Agricultural Economics Association |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The relative efficiency of voluntary versus mandatory environmental regulations
Wu, JunJie, (1996)
-
Optimal design of a voluntary green payment program under asymmetric information
Wu, JunJie, (1995)
-
Wu, JunJie, (1996)
- More ...