2003 Lawrence R. Klein Lecture The Case Against Intellectual Monopoly
In the modern theory of growth, monopoly plays a crucial role both as a cause and an effect of innovation. Innovative firms, it is argued, would have insufficient incentive to innovate should the prospect of monopoly power not be present. This theme of monopoly runs throughout the theory of growth, international trade, and industrial organization. We argue that monopoly is neither needed for, nor a necessary consequence of innovation. In particular, intellectual property is not necessary for, and may hurt more than help, innovation and growth. We argue that, as a practical matter, it is more likely to hurt. Copyright 2004 by the Economics Department Of The University Of Pennsylvania And Osaka University Institute Of Social And Economic Research Association.
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Boldrin, Michele ; Levine, David K. |
Published in: |
International Economic Review. - Department of Economics. - Vol. 45.2004, 2, p. 327-350
|
Publisher: |
Department of Economics |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Growth cycles and market crashes
Boldrin, Michele, (2000)
-
Intellectual property and market size
Boldrin, Michele, (2005)
-
Perfectly competitive innovation
Boldrin, Michele, (2002)
- More ...