A Case for Bundling Public Goods Contributions
We extend the model of voluntary contributions to multiple public goods by allowing for bundling of the public goods. Specifically, we study the case where agents contribute into a common pool which is then allocated toward the financing of two pure public goods. We explore the welfare implications of allowing for such bundling vis-à-vis a separate contributions scheme. We show that for high income inequality or for identical preferences among agents bundling leads to higher joint welfare. Interestingly, a welfare improvement can in some cases occur despite a decrease in total contributions. On the contrary, when agents are heterogenous, for low income inequality bundling can lead to lower total contributions and may decrease welfare compared to a separate contribution scheme. Our findings have implications for the design of charitable institutions and international aid agencies. Copyright 2007 Blackwell Publishing, Inc..
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | GHOSH, SUMAN ; KARAIVANOV, ALEXANDER ; OAK, MANDAR |
Published in: |
Journal of Public Economic Theory. - Association for Public Economic Theory - APET, ISSN 1097-3923. - Vol. 9.2007, 3, p. 425-449
|
Publisher: |
Association for Public Economic Theory - APET |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
A Case for Bundling Public Goods Contributions?
Ghosh, Suman, (2005)
-
A case for bundling public goods contributions
Ghosh, Suman, (2007)
-
Can a raise in your wage make you worse off? A public goods perspective
Ghosh, Suman, (2007)
- More ...