A comparative study of de jure and de facto disclosure between Australia and Singapore
The study analyses de jure disclosure harmony between Australia and Singapore by examining selected disclosure requirements from the statutes, stock exchange listing rules and five accounting standards. Empirical evidence as to Australian and Singaporean companies' de facto disclosure is provided. Two disclosure indices, specifically the no‐violation‐for‐non‐disclosure (NVND) index and the violation‐for‐non‐disclosure (VND), were used to assess the extent of company's disclosure of the selected requirements contained within their respective country's rules.
Year of publication: |
2003
|
---|---|
Authors: | Soewarso, Endang ; Tower, Greg ; Hancock, Phil ; Taplin, Ross |
Published in: |
Asian Review of Accounting. - MCB UP Ltd, ISSN 1758-8863, ZDB-ID 2425199-9. - Vol. 11.2003, 1, p. 18-47
|
Publisher: |
MCB UP Ltd |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Non‐response bias in the use of annual financial reports
Woan Tan, Chyi, (2003)
-
Empires of the sky: determinants of global airlines' accounting-policy choices
Tan, Chyi Woan, (2002)
-
TAN, CHYIWOAN, (2005)
- More ...