A Comparison of Multiple-Unit All-Pay and Winner-Pay Auctions Under Incomplete Information
This article examines the properties of independent-private-value all-pay and winner-pay auctions when there are multiple units sold. We study bidding behavior, efficiency, and revenue in a set of 23 experimental sessions. Our data show that the all-pay auction and the winner-pay auction are empirically revenue equivalent, though both yield higher revenue than the risk neutral Bayesian equilibrium. Our evidence also suggests that the winner-pay auction is more likely to lead to a Pareto-efficient allocation than the all-pay auction. Copyright Economics Department of the University of Pennsylvania and the Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association
Year of publication: |
2002
|
---|---|
Authors: | Barut, Yasar ; Kovenock, Dan ; Noussair, Charles N. |
Published in: |
International Economic Review. - Department of Economics. - Vol. 43.2002, 3, p. 675-708
|
Publisher: |
Department of Economics |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
A comparison of multiple-unit all-pay and winner-pay auctions under incomplete information
Barut, Yasar, (2002)
-
A comparison of multiple-unit all-pay and winner-pay auctions under incomplete information
Barut, Yasar, (1999)
-
A Comparison of Multiple-Unit All-Pay and Winner-Pay Auctions Under Incomplete Information
Barut, Yasar, (2004)
- More ...