A decision-making solution to ship flagging out via administrative maritime strategies
The choice of flag is one of the main strategic/critical decisions for shipowners in the initial stage of maritime enterprises. On the other hand, flagging out has a great influence on the prestige and economic benefits for traditional maritime countries. To address this issue, this paper proposes a Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach using a Primarily Strategic Action Plan (PSAP) in a short-run period and a Secondary Strategic Action Plan (SSAP) for a long-term perspective. The case is demonstrated with respect to the flagging out issue in Turkish shipping fleet. It measures the decision-making tendencies of shipowners using Turkish National Shipping Registry (TNSR), Turkish International Shipping Registry (TISR), and Open Registries (ORs) as potential shipping registry alternatives. The model outcomes originally contribute to Turkish maritime policy, especially in terms of strengthening and reinforcing of TNSR procedures.
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Celik, Metin ; Topcu, Y. Ilker |
Published in: |
Maritime Policy & Management. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0308-8839. - Vol. 41.2014, 1, p. 112-127
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Analytical modelling of shipping business processes based on MCDM methods
Celik, Metin, (2009)
-
A decision-making solution to ship flagging out via administrative maritime strategies
Celik, Metin, (2014)
-
Analytical modelling of shipping business processes based on MCDM methods
Celik, Metin, (2009)
- More ...