A More General Non-expected Utility Model as an Explanation of Gambling Outcomes for Individuals and Markets
One feature of experimental work is the heterogeneity in risk attitudes and probability distortion displayed by agents. We outline a more general non-expected utility model, which nests the models of Markowitz, and Kahneman and Tversky. The model can generate the standard favourite-longshot bias or a reverse favourite-longshot bias as a result of optimal behaviour. We also provide new empirical evidence on the relationship between Tote and bookmaker returns and confirm that the relationship is not as originally conjectured by Gabriel and Marsden. We outline how our new model can provide an explanation of the relationship that is observed. Copyright (c) The London School of Economics and Political Science 2008.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | PEEL, DAVID ; LAW, DAVID |
Published in: |
Economica. - London School of Economics (LSE). - Vol. 76.2009, 302, p. 251-263
|
Publisher: |
London School of Economics (LSE) |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Bounded cumulative prospect theory: some implications for gambling outcomes
Cain, Michael, (2008)
-
Is one price enough to value a state-contingent asset correctly? Evidence from a gambling market
Cain, Michael, (2002)
-
The Favourite-Longshot Bias, Bookmaker Margins and Insider Trading in a Variety of Betting Markets
Cain, Michael, (2003)
- More ...