Agriculture, Diffusion and Development: Ripple Effects of the Neolithic Revolution
Are the effects of the Neolithic revolution still impacting on incomes across the world today? I find strong support for this proposition using new, country-specific estimates of the timing of the agricultural transition and provide evidence that the differences are due to how technological diffusion is accounted for. A correction for world migrations since 1500 significantly improves the fit. Transition year also helps to explain income in 1500 itself, and an alternative measure of pre-modern development, state history, has similar ability to predict income in 1500 and 1997. Copyright (c) The London School of Economics and Political Science 2007.
Year of publication: |
2008
|
---|---|
Authors: | PUTTERMAN, LOUIS |
Published in: |
Economica. - London School of Economics (LSE). - Vol. 75.2008, 300, p. 729-748
|
Publisher: |
London School of Economics (LSE) |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Continuity and change in China's rural development : collective and reform eras in perspective
Putterman, Louis G., (1993)
-
The economic nature of the firm : a reader
Putterman, Louis G., (1996)
-
State and market in development : synergy or rivalry?
Putterman, Louis G., (1992)
- More ...