An alternative interpretation of 'average years of education' in growth regressions
The majority of the empirical literature uses average years of education as a proxy of the human capital stock. Based on Lucas (1988) we argue that the level of average years of education can also be seen as a proxy for the growth rate of the per capita human capital stock. This has fundamental impact on the interpretation of the coefficient and may explain some of the contradictory empirical results.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Foldvari, Peter ; Leeuwen, Bas van |
Published in: |
Applied Economics Letters. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1350-4851. - Vol. 16.2009, 9, p. 945-949
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
How much human capital does Eastern Europe have? Measurement methods and results
Leeuwen, Bas van, (2008)
-
Foldvari, Peter, (2012)
-
Human Capital and Economic Growth in Asia 1890-2000: A Time-series Analysis *
Leeuwen, Bas van, (2008)
- More ...