Are Rating Agencies Powerful? An Investigation Into the Impact and Accuracy of Sovereign Ratings
We find that Credit Rating Agencies (CRA)'s opinions have an impact in the cost of funding of sovereign issuers and consequently ratings are a concern for financial stability. While ratings produced by the major CRAs perform reasonably well when it comes to rank ordering default risk among sovereigns, there is evidence of rating stability failure during the recent global financial crisis. These failures suggest that ratings should incorporate the obligor's resilience to stress scenarios. The empirical evidence also supports: (i) reform initiatives to reduce the impact of CRAs' certification services; (ii) more stringent validation requirements for ratings if they are to be used in capital regulations; and (iii) more transparency with regard to the quantitative parameters used in the rating process.
Year of publication: |
2012-01-01
|
---|---|
Institutions: | International Monetary Fund (IMF) ; International Monetary Fund |
Subject: | Credit risk | Risk management | Sovereign debt | rating agencies | credit ratings | asian crisis | emerging markets | banking supervision | rating systems | financial crisis | risk metrics | global financial crisis | moral hazard | recession | contagion | risk profiles | market risk | risk assessments | risk premium | risk managers | risk assessment | capital requirements | rating system |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Mulder, Christian B., (2000)
-
Revisiting Risk-Weighted Assets
Avramova, Sofiya, (2012)
-
The New Capital Adequacy Framework; Institutional Constraints and Incentive Structures
Karacadag, Cem, (2000)
- More ...
Similar items by person