This paper re-examines the welfare economics of risk. It singles out a class of criteria, the “expected equally-distributed equivalent”, as the unique class which avoids serious drawbacks of existing approaches. Such criteria behave like ex-post criteria when the final statistical distribution of wellbeing is known ex ante, and like ex-ante criteria when risk generates no inequality. The paper also provides a new result on the tension between inequality aversion and respect of individual ex ante preferences, in the vein of Harsanyi’s aggregation theorem.
The text is part of a series LSE Choice Group working paper series, vol. 5, no. 9 36 pages
Classification:
D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty ; D71 - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations ; D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement